Michael Jackson is now in another law suit twister! This time involving his own children!
Debbie Rowe, Micheal Jackson's ex & mother of his children, claims that Paris, 8, and Prince Michael, 9, are not Jackson's biological kids, but were conceived with the help of an anonymous sperm donor. Rowe is battling Jackson for custody of the children!
Now this could lead to Jackson losing two of his three children. Thus, they will be separated from their little four year-old brother, Prince Michael II, who was conceived by a different surrogate mother than his siblings.
Man, that sucks. I don't get it, she goes on TV and says she gave him the kids because she knew he wanted to be a father. Seh signs away her rights and then now she wants them back? I swear haven't Michael and his kids been through enough unwarranted crap? Especially Michael, I mean this has been going on for almost 20 years. He can't even go to the middle east with out someone trying to get a piece of him. I'll pray for you Michael. Sorry about all the stuff that's happening to you man. John, 21, SoCal
In the years to come, those children will thank God they got the hell away from that freak!
Any person that would advocate a situation where two ( actually three - but the mother of the third child seemingly signed an agreement more in Jacko's favour ) unrelated children are living with an indicted pedophile who had a myriad of evidence against him needs to have his head examined.
Jackson clearly skipped the country to escape the ghosts in his closet and maintain possession of these children who he clearly removed from the country to maintain the upper hand in the civil case pertaining to them.
michael is the best dad and debbie does not care about her kids as she give them to mike for moeny if she loved them she would not have do in. michael sould get to keep his kids bceause he loves then and cares about them, michael rocks.
natalie shaw,
derby,
ago 15
Marc, if you had followed the trial you'd know that there was no evidence against Michael Jackson, that's the reason he was acquitted.
oh not again why dont u leave him alone ppl ? poor michael, why is she doin' this to him he's da best father to his kids , he loves them, wish u win da case mike , ur da king dont worry we still love ayaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
We Never heard anything about Debbie Rowe wanting those kids, until her money train cut her off. As soon as Michael cut off her money, Bam, She wants the Kids...........
It's all about the $$$.
Debbie is sick, she didn't contact her kids after she divorced Michael and they don't even know they have a mother because they were toddlers when she left them. She lives in a house with fifteen dogs if weren't for the money coming from her ex-husband and I heard 9 years ago around the time Prince was born that he was somebody else's child and Debbie already had 6 children from another marriage.
I think it's quite clear that they're not Jackson's children.
But it's also even clearer that he loves them unconditionally and without them he will probably commit suicide. They're all he has left.
Rowe cannot legitimately state the trial as a reason for demanding custody seeing as she was called as a prosecution witness and yet did nothing but sit there and praise Jackson.
She signed away her rights to the children and now somehow the judge has dismissed that as a legitimate reason that she can't have children. This makes no sense whatsoever. It is a legal document which states that she is in no way entitled to custody of the children.
If it was anybody else's name on those papers, it would have been game up at the word go for Debbie when they saw she'd done that.
It's all about money and publicity. Until he stopped supporting her she wanted nothing to do with them.
And how can she possibly claim that their passports were faked? She doesn't even know them. She doesn't have contact.
Marc
Clearly you know nothing about the trial last year except what you read in some heavily biased press. The paper mostly reported what the prosecution said they could prove and what they said happened, most of which was completely disproved by the defence. The papers did not tend to print the defences ‘return fire’.
There was not a myriad of evidence against Michael Jackson (No DNA evidenc etc).
It was proven the Mike was not even in the country on some of the days abuse was supposed to have occurred. It was proven that the family were lying about a very large portion of the supposed crimes. Witnesses were caught lying on the stand several times!
What they DID prove was that the mother and family have a history of lying to the courts and defrauding others, including celebrities and even the police force! In fact, the mother is currently on trial for welfare fraud!
The so-called victims (Wade Robson, Macauley Culkin etc) and others all went into the court and said that nothing ever happened to them. In fact they are friends with Jacko to this day. Wade robson has dedicated parts of his show to Jacko before and after the trial. Mac is godfather to Jackos kids. Do you think these things would happen if they were abused? Do you thin k that you can trust a prosecutor that lies to get a celebrity in court? Before you spew any more shit about Jacko being a Paedophile (NOTE THE SPELLING BIATCH!), make sure you know what the hell you are talking about.
Thanks,
Chis.
Wow! What a surprise! So, where has Ms. Rowe been all this time? Certainly not with the kids! Who has been? Micheal! Who has given those kids a world that Ms. Rowe couldn't?! Micheal! Ha! U think that she could have? Yeah maybe with Micheal's money! That's all theses ppl care about it is the money! Thank god I'm not like that with my son! I mean, yeah I would like my ex to pay child support, but hey! If I didn't really need the money, like micheal doesn't, then what's the point? I just buy the kids what they really want knowing I gave it to them, and not always they're father! It works 2 ways! More kids! More money! That's what Ms. Rowe is thinking of! Micheal is just caught in the middle! Bringing his family along. Micheal may have done stupid things but, being a father isn't one of them! If u can give a child or kids a better life and still see they're mother from time 2 time, by all means. But where the hell has Ms. Rowe been? Shopping with money that Micheal has given her? Just 4 being those kids mother? If he turns out not to be they're birth father, then why the problems? At least he has been there! Unlike some guys in this world, who don't take action or care for anyone, including mothers. Grow up u guys and take responsibilty for ur own actions! Micheal is! And has been doing a great job! His fans, "will you be there?", and all will "keep the faith"? I will! Go Micheal! Live ur dream and do whatever it takes to be a family that u r already! Ms. Rowe, u did this 2 urself! U signed the papers! Ur choice then! Now, live with it!!!!
Michael is not the biological father of any of the three kids. And it follows that he doesn't like his own gene pool. Something to think about but is it something to become extreamist about?
How many people in this world don't have kids because of a bad gene pool, but instead adopt. How many more don't have such consideration and extend bad gene pools?
There is much question about what character Michael is of. Then there is established fact.... he likes, collects property created by others. From the Beatles to Pressly (sp?) to marriage interest in Elizbeth Taylor --- intellectual property.... and his eqyptian artifact collection... animals, etc.
Prince Michael II..... so little is known about him, but Michael wanted to show the world this child, and did....
the reason jackson was acquited was because of his name nothing to with evidence if your a star you dont go to jail vince neil killed a man while driving drunk and got 6 months so dont tell me he is innocent he was charged once before got out of that one by paying off the familly now he is charged again the guy is a freak and a liar i think he should go to jail in jeneral population and let the inmates have a little fun with the female wanna be....
I'm tired of hearing rumors or report about michael jackson its always bad news for him & i'm tired of it if they don't have nothing nice to say about him then don't say anything about him at all
those kids are michaels. he loves them with all his heart and would do anything to protect them. Debbie on the other hand would do anything to have something over michael, ie the kids, so that she can milk as much money out of him as possible. she would not be able to look after the kids as well as he could, she would constantly be bothered by the paparazzi and wouldnt be able to protect them let alone taking them from someone who has loved and cared for them their whole lives opposed to using them for money. she would also be taking them away from prince II. thats hardly fair at all. if she ever loved those kids she would not have done what she did in the first place.
oh and also...if debbie really does care about the kids she would want them to stay with michael and blanket. he can give them 100times the amount of love and protection than she could ever. she does whatever she thinks will get her the most money. i for one wouldnt want to be with someone who was using me to get money from the person who truely loves me
Michael Jackson loves, cares for, and provides for those children, he'w the reason they are like they are, he does his best as their Daddy, whether or not anyone believes he helped make them or not, incidentally I believe they are his, and he should have them, this woman signed away her bloody Parental rights, she said they were a present to MJ, and he has been all they know for the whole of their life and she don't want them to call her "MOM" for Pete's sake and now she wants them???? OMG this woman is freakin' mad!! I pray for u also, Michael, just like John said in this blog. Love u More, Michael.
Siena Jackson, MJFC Member and lifelong Michael Jackson fan/loyal supporter.
Michael is the father of his kids it dont matter if he had them with debbie or not, He has raised these kids and have given them more love and protection then some parents i know. He will never turn those kids over to Debbie no matter what happens. He will stay out of the country with them first. Not that i think he will loose them anyway. No judge will take the kids away from Michael there is no reason to .
Those Kids Do Not belong with him!
Those Kids don't have A normal life.
All they've been doing with him is running from country to country.