'The issue does concern the Arab world, i think it would be good to make people that visit your site aware of that. I'm intrested in hearing people's comments about what they think of the presidential debates in America, because it does affect many of us.'

- Lamitta

The first presidential debate, John Kerry outstood the debate, as apposed to the president. During the second debate the president improved which made John Kerry less in control than the previous time. Although, John Kerry still looked more like a president than Bush, talked and faced the audience in much better way...

John Kerry shows his main objective and often proves his opponent wrong. The first question that was asked was the accusation of John Kerry: whether he changes positions. He was specific in his answer and did not generalize or spent half the time criticizing the president. He listed reasons which show evidence, the issues such as ‘The no Child Left behind Act’ and the ‘patriot Act’ that apparently he changed minds in.

With any conflict mentioned during the debate, John Kerry talked about a plan to solve it. He shows that he has an objective for America; for example John Kerry revealed his plan on making the taxes higher for the rich civilians so it would beneficial for middle class and below people through medical and health care.
Senator Kerry also showed one of his objectives when he talked about the War in Iraq. The war in Iraq is a major cost for America, which brings down the economy, hurts the. One of the resolutions John Kerry brought up was bringing allies to America in Iraq to support it so America would not have to pay for all the loss of lives and the cost of making Iraq a better country.
President Bush seems to repeat what he said in previous debate. It seems that the only conflict that John Kerry has is that he sends “mixed messages” in the president’s view. That makes the audience think that he has nothing else to argue. He shows no objective and reveals nothing that would make him a better president; he criticizes Kerry all the time when he’s supposed to show his ability and his capacities to make America a better country. When he was asked of what the mistakes he made and how he’s going to fix them, the president had no real answer; he pretend it that he made no flaw and talked of no resolution.
President Bush concentrates more outside America that inside of it. In contrary to John Kerry, he does not attack the problem wisely. Unless the war wasn’t planned before his rule, President Bush seems to make decisions quickly without analyzing the situation and the circumstances. He seems to be arrogant and suborned with his way of analyzing things and making his decisions. Above all, he does not want to recognize that he has made mistakes.
President Bush seems to neglect international law. He does not consider the need to act through the United Nations and the Security Council; except if they agree with his decisions. He does not recognize that the United States has lost Jobs, when evidently many Americans are without jobs.
George W. Bush has proved to America that he clearly cannot make them feel safe in their own country. Instead of decreasing terrorism he is increasing it everyday as president, and through this debate he shows that his plans are not working well.
Senator Kerry is cultivated and totally capable of ruling the United States the right way. He is confident and has objectives that he explains to the people of America to make them in return feel safe and confident that America has potential to be a better country.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you Lamitta for sharing this essay with us on WALEG.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------